Kapil Sibal on Kolkata R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Doctor Rape and Murder Case
‘Kapil sibal’ a name is enough to define a Juel in defence lawyer Era. Either the matter of any political parties or any kind of high profile matter which ia raised in supreme court he is always fought excellently and also got an unanimous victory.He is also a member of upper house from Last 8 yeas. Now he is attached 78 years & with lots of designations.
Sibal’s 2004 victory contributed to thk UPA alliance, led by the Congress, winning the general election. The coalition then established a government and started assigning Sibal to cabinet positions. After that, he stopped practicing law actively. In 2006, he was given his first cabinet-level responsibilities when he assumed the portfolios for ocean development (which was later renamed earth sciences) and research and technology.
He was appointed minister of human resource development in 2009, and the following year, at his suggestion, the parliament enacted a bill requiring the government to give all children between the ages of six and fourteen free elementary education. Sibal held the combined position of minister for information technology and communications from January 2011 till he gave up the human.
Kapil sibal a name again came to highlight now days for enrolling him as a defence counsel of rape and brutality murder of a girl who was post graduate medical student RG kar medical College . While Whole India now protesting but now the case is sensitively raised on supreme court.
Kapil Sibal on Kolkata Rape and Murder Case:
The West Bengal government, represented by Kapil Sibal, contended that the hospital had taken prompt action in response to the court’s concerns. This included filing a case of unnatural death and establishing a board that included a judicial magistrate.
But CJI Chandrachud emphasized that the hospital had to submit the FIR, especially since the victim’s parents weren’t there. & Again when the court ask why the FIR is so delay to registered Sibal countered, stating, “That is not correct. The FIR was registered immediately, and the inquest shows it is a case of murder.” But these facts are still not to sufficient to satisfy the supreme court judge’s bench for anounce a favourable order
